After the snack that was dinner (I was really not moved to eat much tonight, due to having been fed not too long earlier), I started looking for the portable CD player. This is because I thought it would be nice to have some music going in my office (while I drew), which would not all be music downloads. I have one or two boxes of CDs which I’ve scavenged…and have not heard any of them in a long while.
When the location of the boom box was not immediately apparent, however, I did see something that caught my eye: my guitar. Because we’ve put a new battery in the guitar tuner (it uses a 9-volt!), I decided to try it out. It was out of tune in a way that I had been blind to; mostly, flat, but still close enough to on-target that I didn’t have to worry about being totally lost (I do have a pitch pipe around here somewhere, but have a feeling it’s in the junk room — with my music stand and guitar case).
So I played around on that until my fingers got to the point where I knew I would get blisters if I played any farther. I’m getting better at remembering the location of notes on the fret board; though I still am not sure of the names of those notes or their location on sheet music, so maybe I should say that I’m getting better at remembering the location of sounds on the fret board.
I’ve also realized that I will have to learn classical fingering if I want to be able to play the songs that I want to play. In classical style, it’s possible to ring up to five notes at once — one with each nail — as versus picking out notes one at a time, or only strumming chords.
After my fingers couldn’t stand it anymore, I set the guitar back and picked up the box which holds all of my prismatic markers, brush markers, and fineliners. There are also four other sets in there: one of LYRA graphite crayons (they only make three hardnesses, so far as I know), one box of Koh-I-Noor woodless colored pencils, a tube of General’s Willow charcoals (they wipe away easily and so are good if you need temporary marks), and my (soft) charcoal set…the last of which, I really need to clean out.
I did two drawings tonight with the markers, on 18″x24″ Sketch paper (this is the same pad gifted to me on leaving my first University, back in 2002…15 years old, and not yellow?). I am not sure it would be best to show them, though…would it be too much pressure to show my experiments? I don’t think validation or approval would help, here, more than it would hold me back from trying new things.
The first one was just me experimenting while thinking about moths (and spirals). Something about fuzzy, feathery bugs…(and there’s probably a rebirth thing going on in there, too, not to mention the entire light-seeking thing which…still doesn’t make sense to me). It could also be related to the green skeleton image I got back this Fall which had metamorphosis as a major theme (there was also a butterfly in there…I’ve posted about it before, but need to take a clearer shot).
The second image I did was an experiment in which I realized I was totally using lines, hatching, and cross-hatching, and started intentionally working with more random applications of line (bullet nibs for the win)…which I find I like immensely more than the way I had been working, though maybe that’s because it’s new.
The randomness appeals to me; it’s also very immediate and committed, at least with markers (though these markers are all water-based, so if I wanted to, I could wet them and use the ink as a wash — on top of a surface which could take a wash without warping).
I also found that the Staedtler Mars Graphic 3000 Duo markers (from years ago) behave differently than the Tombow Dual Brush markers. The nibs are made of different materials; the Staedtler brush nibs are some kind of porous rubber which enables more painterly strokes (and gradual fade-outs, and finer delicate lines), while the Tombows are more like a straightforward water-based brush marker with a more fibrous and firmer/less responsive tip, on the brush side. (Both markers have a firm bullet nib on the other tip.) The advantage of the Tombows, of course, is the color range, and the fact that they are made (like the Staedtlers) not to easily dry out, unless the cap isn’t pushed on fully. Of course, though, my Staedtlers are years old. I’ve seen a revival of interest in them recently, though…but I can’t vouch for their current quality.
(The Mars Graphic 3000 markers, along with Staedtler’s Mars white plastic erasers [less smudging — especially with Pentel Hi-Polymer leads (ha — I used to draw in mechanical pencil), and clean erasure], were what immediately gave me a favorable impression of Staedtler, some years back. However, I’ve heard that the quality of some known brands has diminished in some product lines, due to the current trend of adult coloring books leading to demand for cheaper materials. I think D told me this when I was looking at the long Stabilo 68 bullet-tip marker sets at an office supply store [I like these and have the mini version (I think I got a set of 18)…but I am not sure how many colors they actually come in. A quick search brings up a 50-color set…which I’m fairly certain I can’t get in-store in open stock].)
What I find interesting about working on art this way is that there’s very much a problem-solving part of my mind being engaged, though the problem I’m solving is one that I am generally not wholly conscious of, but become more aware of during the process of drawing. Each mark suggests a new one, until the piece would suffer detraction from extra visual noise. It’s like a Rorschach that I make and develop, that is. And it’s nice to see a line suggested before it’s made. It’s something that doesn’t happen with me so easily in painting (where there perhaps may be more focus on areas of color than boundaries of areas of color — or, lines). I’m not sure if it’s actually possible for me to develop that skill in painting, this late in the game (I learned to draw at about 14, when my brain probably had higher plasticity than now).
The problem in this case could actually start out as, “how do I make something different than what I’ve done before?” This is how I began my first piece, which is largely orange, yellow, red, and blue-green: I have a tendency to gravitate initially towards violet, which is something I intentionally stopped myself from doing, this time. In the second case, it became very apparent that I was depending overly on about three techniques, and motifs repeated from the first piece. I wouldn’t lose anything by experimenting, and knew I might not post the results, so I went ahead and did so — and the looseness and immediacy of scribbly marks actually added a lot to the piece, which is now, apparently, about safety/predictability and risk/reward.
And, of course, these pieces are in rainbow colors, and so suggest a child’s work…but it’s nice to be able to see the colors before using them, and it’s nice to have them immediately available, if just for play.
I mean, play should be fun, right? 🙂 And none of us would be any good at art if we were so afraid to play with our materials as children that we didn’t…