I think I’ve remembered that I’m in grad school, and thus, no one is watching me to make sure I do all my practice exercises. 😛 In any case, I did attend the meeting tonight, and feel relatively much better — especially after having gotten through the chapter on Dewey (except for Dewey Abridged, which I just skipped — as we’re going as specific as possible, and the Dewey Abridged section repeats a lot of material).
I’m getting to the point where I can look at my wrong answers and see where I made a mistake, so this much is good. (I’m also really glad that I bought this book, because there are highlights all over this chapter, not to mention I’m doing a number on the spine. The book is about 2″ thick, so…) The section I read today did clarify a lot that I didn’t know — particularly, through examples.
I’m now on the second half of the lecture that was given about a week and a half ago (I’m still behind), but I don’t have to do any more new textbook reading, for now. Well, I can; I probably just shouldn’t — I should concentrate on the upcoming graded exercise. What I did do tonight — other than the meeting — was complete Exercise #4, start in on #5 (there are seven for this unit), go over some mistakes, and start rereading and working through the Week 3 Lecture Notes.
It seems like a lot of getting the answers correct depends on picking the right trail to take through the site, and one doesn’t know the correct trail, necessarily, unless one reads the notes at each juncture.
Right now I can’t bring myself to work further on the (interactive) lecture, largely because of being faced with a textwall where it comes to entering into working on Table 3B. I guess intimidation isn’t a good excuse, though, because that textwall is still going to be there, tomorrow.
Did I do anything fun today? Not really — the help session was kind of the high point of it. I also haven’t exercised in a couple of days, which I’m not really happy about, though I am still losing weight. Yeah, I guess last night was my fun time. I did find the photo I was thinking about in my last post, though:
This is the image which I’ve been scared to start painting, because I know it isn’t going to turn out the way it looks in the photo. Plus, I love the photo. I could do a watercolor version of this, but I’d have to use masking fluid for large areas of sunlight, and I’m a bit paranoid about becoming sensitized to latex via fumes or skin contact. Or maybe I can use tape? I didn’t think about that until just now…
I can see how I could work into this image with Permanent Rose and Phthalo Green/Viridian Hue (in watercolor), or Quinacridone Magenta and Phthalo Green and Blue (in acrylic) and maybe a warm color like Indian Yellow…then there is the question of the background. Is it possible to mix a shade akin to Hooker’s Green, without actually using Hooker’s Green? It’s probably possible…I just have hated Hooker’s Green since I first got exposed to it in colored pencils, but maybe the pencils were just dull.
I suppose, what do I have to lose, right? Besides time.
I do have a lot of reading coming due for Metadata, but I’d rather miss the 1.5 points for the Discussion Post than the 100 points for the Dewey exercise.
And I still don’t know how to underpaint, though maybe if I made things in Phthalo Blue/Green and white with gesso, it would provide a good foundation for the rest of the project. One of the big strengths of this image is the limited color palette, though…something I’ve found with botanical images in general. Plus, the high value contrast between the shadows and highlights.
I guess if I mess up, I just gesso over it…
And no, I’m not sure whether to use a limited palette or the more complex color mixing I’m known for…the latter would likely be easier, so long as I stick with the same palette through the whole thing…(like adding violets and such — things not emphasized in the photo — would be interesting). My teacher used to tell us “not to become a slave to the photograph” and that only laying out certain colors was like “trying to conduct a symphony with only a few notes”.
Yeah, the worst that can happen is that I just paint over it…as long as I don’t use textural media…
Hey — maybe I can do a small version of it before the 30″x30″? I have a 12″x12″ board gessoed and ready to go…it’s much less of a loss to lose a square foot of Hardbord! And I can practice my color combinations on it…and my drawing in charcoal. And I have another side if I totally mess up.
I made a note to myself last night as regards sharing my images…that there’s no way for me to keep a creative work entirely to myself, unless I don’t make it. Once it’s shown or heard or read, it can be copied; but the alternative is self-silencing, which seems to defeat the purpose of creativity. It’s like being a singer who sings beautiful songs, but only when no one else is around to hear.
In that case, does the problem really lie with selfishness, as I’ve assumed, or does it lie in fear of judgment (or even esteem)? What’s the value of being creative if no one sees what I create? Of course, I’d still create, because that’s a key part of who I feel myself to be, at this point; but it’s like hoarding…which would seem to be the opposite of what I came into this world to do. Creativity is for sharing…right? It can’t do its work if no one knows about it…